Triple
T3351817
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Akira Suzuki |
E70512
|
entity |
| Predicate | developedMethodUsedIn |
P47411
|
FINISHED |
| Object | pharmaceutical synthesis |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pharmaceutical synthesis | Statement: [Akira Suzuki, developedMethodUsedIn, pharmaceutical synthesis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developedMethodUsedIn Context triple: [Akira Suzuki, developedMethodUsedIn, pharmaceutical synthesis]
-
A.
developmentMethod
Indicates the process, technique, or approach used to create, build, or evolve something.
-
B.
developedThrough
Indicates that something came into existence, was created, or was brought to its current form by means of a specified process, method, or developmental pathway.
-
C.
developedInCase
Indicates that something (such as a method, argument, or principle) was formulated, articulated, or established within the context of a particular case.
-
D.
developedAs
Indicates that one entity was created, designed, or evolved specifically to function as or replace another entity.
-
E.
developedWith
Indicates that something was created, built, or produced using a specified tool, technology, method, or collaborator.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a4ef7c8190a29e2bbd6fa454e4 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb221a7d8819086cd0f826eca0fe8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada42fbe7c8190b9f185b5ab985f17 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada52716ec81908e89688a81039394 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:12 p.m.