Triple

T33495607
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bona E857854 entity
Predicate numberInLatinMorphology P204098 FINISHED
Object plural of bonum in some constructions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: plural of bonum in some constructions | Statement: [Bona, numberInLatinMorphology, plural of bonum in some constructions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: numberInLatinMorphology
Context triple: [Bona, numberInLatinMorphology, plural of bonum in some constructions]
  • A. numberOfGrammaticalCases
    Indicates the relationship that specifies how many distinct grammatical cases a language or linguistic system possesses.
  • B. latinGenitive
    Indicates that one entity is in the Latin genitive case in relation to another, typically expressing possession, origin, or association.
  • C. hasLatinAdjectiveForm
    Indicates that an entity has a corresponding adjectival form in Latin derived from its name or designation.
  • D. openingWordsLatin
    Indicates that the opening words of a text, work, or document are expressed in Latin.
  • E. hasGrammaticalGenderInLatin
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific grammatical gender (masculine, feminine, or neuter) in the Latin language.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3497660508190a541826a81f7e9ab completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a03232efd8481908ee25447a29ee20b completed May 12, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a032269dcb08190907c965c28145b77 completed May 12, 2026, 12:51 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a03232e53788190abf17396e8d02dbf completed May 12, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:38 a.m.