Triple

T33465147
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bentley Drummle E857023 entity
Predicate legalClientOf P8814 FINISHED
Object Mr. Jaggers NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mr. Jaggers | Statement: [Bentley Drummle, legalClientOf, Mr. Jaggers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalClientOf
Context triple: [Bentley Drummle, legalClientOf, Mr. Jaggers]
  • A. lawPartnerOf
    Indicates a professional relationship in which two individuals are partners in the same law firm or legal practice.
  • B. legalEntityOf
    Indicates that one entity is the legally recognized organization or body to which another entity belongs or with which it is formally associated.
  • C. legalRepresentation chosen
    Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
  • D. organizationRepresentedTo
    Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of or serves as the representative of an organization in a given context or interaction.
  • E. legalParties
    Indicates that the related entities are formally recognized participants in a legal relationship, case, contract, or proceeding.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34973461481909c701c98ebd75623 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff246e0d4481908bcec718e1d4025b completed May 9, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff23cb70ac81909b776ace4597ae9c completed May 9, 2026, 12:08 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:37 a.m.