Triple
T3344084
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mary Doe |
E70327
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCaseIssue |
P4511
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constitutionality of Georgia abortion statute |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constitutionality of Georgia abortion statute | Statement: [Mary Doe, legalCaseIssue, constitutionality of Georgia abortion statute]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseIssue Context triple: [Mary Doe, legalCaseIssue, constitutionality of Georgia abortion statute]
-
A.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
B.
hasLegalIssue
chosen
Indicates that an entity is involved in, associated with, or subject to a legal problem, dispute, or proceeding.
-
C.
legalRepresentation
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
-
D.
legalQuestion
Indicates that one entity poses or represents a question concerning legal rights, obligations, or interpretations to another entity or within a legal context.
-
E.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a405e48190b6e68de7cf9f319e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb1f23008819084ea68b8431c50ab |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada42df1d48190874bb05f95deefde |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:12 p.m.