Triple

T33415551
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Scream Extractor E855704 entity
Predicate antagonisticAssociation P129484 FINISHED
Object Randall Boggs NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Randall Boggs | Statement: [Scream Extractor, antagonisticAssociation, Randall Boggs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: antagonisticAssociation
Context triple: [Scream Extractor, antagonisticAssociation, Randall Boggs]
  • A. antagonisticInteractionWith chosen
    Indicates a hostile or oppositional interaction in which one entity acts against, harms, or obstructs another.
  • B. hasContrastingRelationshipWith
    Indicates a relationship in which two entities are opposed, divergent, or markedly different in qualities, roles, or effects.
  • C. antAssociation
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity is associated or interacts in a specific, notable way with ants.
  • D. antiCorrelatedWith
    Indicates that increases in one quantity are systematically associated with decreases in another, and vice versa.
  • E. antagonisticArc
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity consistently opposes, harms, or works against another over the course of a conflict or storyline.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3496f04a08190804e56ac5098b8e4 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6e47f37848190aadb137c81760f1f completed May 3, 2026, 6 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6e3da41948190a4cfe866ce184f73 completed May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:36 a.m.