Triple
T33403290
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Catherine (ex‑wife) |
E855371
|
entity |
| Predicate | maritalStatusWithTheodoreTwombly |
P177616
|
FINISHED |
| Object | divorced |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: divorced | Statement: [Catherine (ex‑wife), maritalStatusWithTheodoreTwombly, divorced]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: maritalStatusWithTheodoreTwombly Context triple: [Catherine (ex‑wife), maritalStatusWithTheodoreTwombly, divorced]
-
A.
maritalStatusBeforeTobias
Indicates the marital status a person had prior to their relationship or marriage with Tobias.
-
B.
maritalStatusClaimed
Indicates that an entity has asserted or reported a particular marital status, regardless of whether it is verified or legally confirmed.
-
C.
maritalStatusInDisguise
Indicates that an entity’s true marital status is being concealed or misrepresented, typically appearing different from what it actually is.
-
D.
maritalStatusOfUnion
Indicates the type or state of the marital relationship that characterizes a particular union between entities.
-
E.
hasMaritalStatusAtEnd
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific marital status at the end of a given period, event, or reference time.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3496e3f1c8190bcecfa82aa9d17ff |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7009d39508190af7301f824615e88 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6fc5740fc81909774a4f65201a3ff |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6ffb7554881908993d6d2ffbcf8f5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:56 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:36 a.m.