Triple

T33356254
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Air New Zealand Cup E854078 entity
Predicate mostSuccessfulTeams P176540 FINISHED
Object Auckland NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Auckland | Statement: [Air New Zealand Cup, mostSuccessfulTeams, Auckland]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mostSuccessfulTeams
Context triple: [Air New Zealand Cup, mostSuccessfulTeams, Auckland]
  • A. mostSuccessfulTeamsCount
    Indicates the number of teams that are considered the most successful according to a specified criterion.
  • B. mostSuccessfulActiveTeam
    Indicates that the subject is the currently active team with the highest level of success (e.g., wins, titles, or performance) compared to all other active teams in the relevant context.
  • C. mostSuccessfulClub
    Indicates that one club holds the highest level of success (e.g., by titles, achievements, or performance) compared to all other clubs in the given context.
  • D. eraOfTeamSuccess
    Indicates a period during which a particular team experienced notable or sustained success.
  • E. anotherSuccessfulTeam
    Indicates that one team is distinct from and also meets the criteria for being considered a successful team, in relation to another referenced team.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3496acbc8819099fd0305ecc42080 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6e3156ea48190b604e414665ef351 completed May 3, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6de0b9ba48190887c9eb5d06a2e94 completed May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6e312d7fc819094dec41810f2585d completed May 3, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:34 a.m.