Triple

T3333377
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Coconino County, Arizona E70083 entity
Predicate areaRankInUSCounties P1891 FINISHED
Object second-largest by area in contiguous United States LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: second-largest by area in contiguous United States | Statement: [Coconino County, Arizona, areaRankInUSCounties, second-largest by area in contiguous United States]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areaRankInUSCounties
Context triple: [Coconino County, Arizona, areaRankInUSCounties, second-largest by area in contiguous United States]
  • A. populationRankInCounty
    Indicates the relative position of an entity in terms of population size compared to other entities within the same county.
  • B. areaRankInUS chosen
    Indicates the relative position of an entity in a ranking of areas within the United States, based on its size.
  • C. numberPerCounty
    Indicates the quantity or count of something associated with each individual county.
  • D. mostPopulousCountyIn
    Indicates that the subject is the county with the largest population within the specified object region or jurisdiction.
  • E. areaRankingInContiguousUS
    Indicates the relative position of an entity when U.S. states are ordered by area, considering only those in the contiguous United States.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a24f208190bcf83131bfed3521 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb194960081909333c855f06d8b03 completed March 8, 2026, 5:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada42c2ba8819091136805ce17b39d completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:12 p.m.