Triple
T33309882
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tim Warden |
E852840
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBehaviorDescriptor |
P11875
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mysterious behavior |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mysterious behavior | Statement: [Tim Warden, hasBehaviorDescriptor, mysterious behavior]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBehaviorDescriptor Context triple: [Tim Warden, hasBehaviorDescriptor, mysterious behavior]
-
A.
hasIRBehavior
Indicates that an entity exhibits or is characterized by a specific infrared (IR) behavior or response.
-
B.
hasCoreBehavior
Indicates that an entity possesses or exhibits a fundamental, defining behavior that is central to its function or identity.
-
C.
hasTailBehavior
Indicates that an entity exhibits a specific pattern, manner, or type of behavior involving its tail.
-
D.
hasInteriorBehavior
Indicates that an entity exhibits a particular behavior or set of behaviors within its internal or enclosed space.
-
E.
hasDescription
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a textual description that explains or characterizes it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349679fd8819093b9b40e989440e3 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b2f3a104819098ddd8909eaf596c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b1b8a9fc8190a1279e67a2d12707 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:36 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:33 a.m.