Triple
T33279334
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of Queensland |
E851994
|
entity |
| Predicate | isPrincipalCourtOfAppealFor |
P12546
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Queensland |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Queensland | Statement: [Supreme Court of Queensland, isPrincipalCourtOfAppealFor, Queensland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isPrincipalCourtOfAppealFor Context triple: [Supreme Court of Queensland, isPrincipalCourtOfAppealFor, Queensland]
-
A.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
-
B.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
-
C.
hasPrincipalJudge
Indicates that one entity serves as the main or presiding judge for another entity, such as a court or judicial body.
-
D.
isMajorCourtIn
chosen
Indicates that a court is a primary or high-level judicial body within the specified jurisdiction or region.
-
E.
hearsAppealsIn
Indicates that a judicial body has the authority to review and decide appeals within a specified jurisdiction or court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349653da08190819876015a298fdb |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd2839880c819099a7a89783f2270e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd23dc5da48190ae8ba08947d34956 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:44 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:32 a.m.