Triple

T3325218
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mount Oxley (Liverpool Range) E69897 entity
Predicate hasSummitRole P47300 FINISHED
Object highest point of the Liverpool Range LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: highest point of the Liverpool Range | Statement: [Mount Oxley (Liverpool Range), hasSummitRole, highest point of the Liverpool Range]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSummitRole
Context triple: [Mount Oxley (Liverpool Range), hasSummitRole, highest point of the Liverpool Range]
  • A. hasSummit
    Indicates that one entity possesses, features, or includes a summit or highest point as part of its structure or characteristics.
  • B. hasSummitConditions
    Indicates that specific environmental or situational conditions required for a summit (e.g., peak ascent or high-level meeting) are present or satisfied.
  • C. hasSummitFeature
    Indicates that a summit (or peak) possesses a particular characteristic, attribute, or notable feature.
  • D. hasSummitName
    Indicates that a summit or peak is identified by a specific name.
  • E. hasSummitTrail
    Indicates that there exists a trail or route leading to the summit or highest point of a geographic feature.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a1829881908942c14075644d0d completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb16ca13c8190aea8caed8ccd9b88 completed March 8, 2026, 5:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada42a19348190a3862ce02451f4aa completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ada52716ec81908e89688a81039394 completed March 8, 2026, 4:34 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:11 p.m.