Triple
T33240468
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Envinyatar |
E850948
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithDefeatOf |
P206399
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sauron |
E218722
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sauron | Statement: [Envinyatar, associatedWithDefeatOf, Sauron]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithDefeatOf Context triple: [Envinyatar, associatedWithDefeatOf, Sauron]
-
A.
defeatedBy
Indicates that one entity has been beaten, overcome, or conquered by another in a contest, conflict, or competition.
-
B.
eventuallyDefeatedBy
Indicates that one entity is ultimately overcome, beaten, or conquered by another, possibly after some duration or sequence of events.
-
C.
significantDefeat
Indicates that one entity has decisively and substantially defeated another, implying a clear and impactful victory rather than a narrow or marginal one.
-
D.
typeOfDefeat
Indicates the specific manner or category of loss or failure experienced in a competitive or conflict situation.
-
E.
sideDefeated
Indicates that one side in a conflict, competition, or contest has been beaten or overcome by another side.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34962386c81909ddc3bf9e18ddeb8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a352f9859c08190b61e7603e9ce5fff |
completed | June 19, 2026, 12:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f338b881908e5593e45d764f4d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c7fb9f88190b384b1b68200aef0 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:31 a.m.