Triple
T33220792
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gail Bugliosi |
E850414
|
entity |
| Predicate | spouseNotableCase |
P33404
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Charles Manson murder trials |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Charles Manson murder trials | Statement: [Gail Bugliosi, spouseNotableCase, Charles Manson murder trials]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: spouseNotableCase Context triple: [Gail Bugliosi, spouseNotableCase, Charles Manson murder trials]
-
A.
spouseNotableFor
Indicates that a person's spouse is recognized or distinguished for a particular achievement, role, or characteristic.
-
B.
spouse notableWork
Indicates that a person's spouse is significantly associated with a particular notable work.
-
C.
hasSpouseOrPartnerInLegalCaseWith
chosen
Indicates that two individuals are spouses or partners who are jointly involved in the same legal case.
-
D.
spouseNotableWorkField
Indicates that the notable work or professional field associated with a person’s spouse is being specified.
-
E.
spouseNotableAward
Indicates that a person’s spouse has received a notable award or honor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3496083dc8190b229bb6932dc548b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fdb31800508190beec15adb9bbd292 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdb19c381c8190bafb2f565da097f1 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:30 a.m.