Triple
T331781
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Catholic Epistles |
E6639
|
entity |
| Predicate | theologicalThemes |
P3095
|
FINISHED |
| Object | faith and works |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: faith and works | Statement: [Catholic Epistles, theologicalThemes, faith and works]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: theologicalThemes Context triple: [Catholic Epistles, theologicalThemes, faith and works]
-
A.
theologicalFocus
chosen
Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or directed toward theological themes, questions, or doctrines.
-
B.
theologicalCategory
Indicates the classification of something according to a particular theological type, tradition, or doctrinal category.
-
C.
theologicalTradition
Indicates the religious or doctrinal school, lineage, or system of belief within which an entity’s theology is developed or practiced.
-
D.
theologicalInterpretation
Indicates a relationship where an event, text, or phenomenon is understood or explained through religious or doctrinal beliefs and principles.
-
E.
philosophicalTheme
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79434908190a9d5afe415153ad9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eab1a7048190ac690ddc2e294914 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e94c6d8881908239d3788c018adf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.