Triple

T3317339
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yurievichi E69711 entity
Predicate hasDynasticLegitimacySource P20125 FINISHED
Object descent from Rurik LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: descent from Rurik | Statement: [Yurievichi, hasDynasticLegitimacySource, descent from Rurik]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDynasticLegitimacySource
Context triple: [Yurievichi, hasDynasticLegitimacySource, descent from Rurik]
  • A. dynasticOrigin chosen
    Indicates the historical dynasty or ruling family from which an entity originates or descends.
  • B. dynasticStatus
    Indicates the relationship between an entity and a ruling dynasty, such as membership in, association with, or status within that dynastic line.
  • C. hasDynasticOrder
    Indicates that there exists a specific sequence or hierarchy of dynasties or ruling lines associated with the subject.
  • D. hasMajorDynasty
    Indicates that an entity (such as a region, state, or historical period) is associated with or ruled by a particular major dynasty.
  • E. dynasticType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of dynastic relationship or succession pattern that applies between ruling entities or lineages.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a0bb048190a5458d2738012d61 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb113cb6c8190989b06476f6015fd completed March 8, 2026, 5:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada4282730819092aa39c5f9269df0 completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:11 p.m.