Triple

T33133133
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lawrence Washington E847926 entity
Predicate lostPosition P176126 FINISHED
Object rector of Purleigh, Essex LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rector of Purleigh, Essex | Statement: [Lawrence Washington, lostPosition, rector of Purleigh, Essex]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lostPosition
Context triple: [Lawrence Washington, lostPosition, rector of Purleigh, Essex]
  • A. lostDuring
    Indicates that something ceased to be in possession or was no longer retained while a particular event, process, or time period was occurring.
  • B. lostStatus
    Indicates that an entity has transitioned into a state of being lost, missing, or no longer in its expected or intended possession or location.
  • C. lostIn
    Indicates that an entity has become unable to find its way or is no longer in control or possession within a particular place, situation, or context.
  • D. futurePosition
    Indicates that one entity will occupy or hold the position, role, or location of another entity at a later point in time.
  • E. lost
    Indicates that an entity no longer possesses or has been deprived of another entity it previously had.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3495961d88190b16ea542c2c5f825 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6db6af1d88190989810182354d60f completed May 3, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d82d068c8190940a3200ed760e38 completed May 3, 2026, 5:07 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6db6a38d881909ecc75cc527910f2 completed May 3, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:27 a.m.