Triple

T33103809
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Juror 9 E847128 entity
Predicate relationshipToOtherJurors P206351 FINISHED
Object often contrasts with the anger and prejudice of Juror 3 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: often contrasts with the anger and prejudice of Juror 3 | Statement: [Juror 9, relationshipToOtherJurors, often contrasts with the anger and prejudice of Juror 3]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToOtherJurors
Context triple: [Juror 9, relationshipToOtherJurors, often contrasts with the anger and prejudice of Juror 3]
  • A. relationshipToJudges4
    Indicates a specified type of relationship or connection that an entity has to a particular group or set of judges.
  • B. hasJuror
    Indicates that a person or legal body is assigned or associated with a specific juror in a judicial context.
  • C. courtRelationship
    Indicates a formal legal relationship between parties established or recognized through court proceedings or judicial decisions.
  • D. jurorDescription
    Indicates that a person is described as serving or having served in the role of a juror, often including details about their status or characteristics in that capacity.
  • E. hasJuryMembersFrom
    Indicates that a legal case or trial includes jury members originating from a specified location or group.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3495686508190b76bf20fa5e00bf7 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379f338b881908e5593e45d764f4d completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c7fb9f88190b384b1b68200aef0 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:26 a.m.