Triple
T33096455
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | sequent calculus |
E846921
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalSequentForm |
—
|
GENERATED |
| Object | Γ ⊢ Δ |
—
|
UNRECOGNIZED GENERATED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalSequentForm Context triple: [sequent calculus, typicalSequentForm, Γ ⊢ Δ]
-
A.
logicalForm
Indicates a relationship where an expression is associated with its structured, formal logical representation.
-
B.
typicalForm
chosen
Indicates that one entity represents the standard, characteristic, or most common form or shape in which another entity typically appears or is realized.
-
C.
canBeFormalizedAs
Indicates that one concept, statement, or system can be represented, expressed, or captured within a formal framework or formal language.
-
D.
isFormalizedBy
Indicates that something is given a defined, structured, or official form through a specific method, process, or representation.
-
E.
isCanonicalFormOf
Indicates that one entity is the standard or officially accepted form or representation of another, often more variant, entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495590dc8190aa04f3dec74ce976 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:26 a.m.