Triple

T33085740
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Loma Prieta E846633 entity
Predicate typicalReferentType P206344 FINISHED
Object natural elevation — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: natural elevation | Statement: [Loma Prieta, typicalReferentType, natural elevation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalReferentType
Context triple: [Loma Prieta, typicalReferentType, natural elevation]
  • A. typicalTargetType
    Indicates the usual or most common type or category of entity that serves as the target or recipient in a given relationship or action.
  • B. typicalCoreType
    Indicates that something is a standard or characteristic core type within a given classification or system.
  • C. typicalConstituentType
    Indicates the usual or characteristic type of component that typically makes up or forms part of something.
  • D. typicalObjectType
    Indicates that something is a common or characteristic type of object typically associated with or involved in another entity or situation.
  • E. typicalIn
    Indicates that something commonly occurs, appears, or is found within a given context, category, or environment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34954d46c8190a04a159cc5f99efd completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379f338b881908e5593e45d764f4d completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c7fb9f88190b384b1b68200aef0 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:26 a.m.