Triple
T33051968
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LCD |
E845749
|
entity |
| Predicate | dominantTechnologyFor |
P7517
|
FINISHED |
| Object | computer monitors in the 2000s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: computer monitors in the 2000s | Statement: [LCD, dominantTechnologyFor, computer monitors in the 2000s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dominantTechnologyFor Context triple: [LCD, dominantTechnologyFor, computer monitors in the 2000s]
-
A.
laterUsedTechnology
Indicates that one entity adopted or employed a technology after another entity had already used it.
-
B.
technologyType
Indicates the specific kind or category of technology associated with an entity or relationship.
-
C.
focusTechnology
Indicates that an entity is centered on, specializes in, or primarily deals with a particular technology.
-
D.
technologyCounterpartOf
Indicates a relationship where one technology serves as an equivalent, alternative, or corresponding counterpart to another technology.
-
E.
technologyTrend
chosen
Indicates a relationship where a technology is characterized as part of a broader pattern of change or direction in technological development over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495242e48190996a2cb2beab5455 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78fd5a6388190bfda4bbb2e222e5b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f78e2ac3fc819081a45c6841375c8d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:24 a.m.