Triple
T33028894
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tom Truscott |
E845110
|
entity |
| Predicate | systemDesigned |
P148316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | distributed discussion system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: distributed discussion system | Statement: [Tom Truscott, systemDesigned, distributed discussion system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: systemDesigned Context triple: [Tom Truscott, systemDesigned, distributed discussion system]
-
A.
designedAsPartOfSystemBy
Indicates that an entity was intentionally created as a component or module within a larger system by a specific designer or designing agent.
-
B.
systemDesignation
Indicates that an entity has been assigned a specific formal label or identifier within a defined system or framework.
-
C.
isDesignedAs
Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured to serve as or function in the role of something else.
-
D.
designedWith
Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
-
E.
programDesign
chosen
Indicates the relationship in which an entity is responsible for creating, planning, or structuring the overall design of a program or system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34950749c8190ae05cd27adb16d58 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e02ba6b881908dfafc52d3b75f1c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de09c2f481909f8b2545d3208c9f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:24 a.m.