Triple
T3293835
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Central Mississippi |
E69162
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Copiah County |
E324836
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Copiah County | Statement: [Central Mississippi, contains, Copiah County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Copiah County Context triple: [Central Mississippi, contains, Copiah County]
-
A.
Copiah County, Mississippi
chosen
Copiah County, Mississippi is a rural county in central Mississippi known for its agricultural heritage and small-town communities.
-
B.
Lamar County
Lamar County is a rural county in western Alabama known for its small communities and agricultural landscape.
-
C.
Lamar County
Lamar County is a county in the state of Georgia, United States, known for its seat in the city of Barnesville and its location in the central part of the state.
-
D.
Smith County, Mississippi
Smith County, Mississippi is a rural county in central Mississippi known for its small communities, forestry and agriculture-based economy, and location within the Jackson metropolitan region.
-
E.
Pearl River County
Pearl River County is a county in southern Mississippi known for its mix of small towns, including Picayune, and rural communities near the Louisiana border.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad859d45748190b0742408c954b39f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb074f35081909dd3c8a09544b5f1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:23 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b44ed5f23c8190bfd1fb6370aad390 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 5:52 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:10 p.m.