Triple
T32926402
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NATO Cyber Defence Committee |
E842284
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cyber defence governance body |
C40022
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: cyber defence governance body Context triple: [NATO Cyber Defence Committee, instanceOf, cyber defence governance body]
-
A.
cybersecurity coordination body
A cybersecurity coordination body is an organization that facilitates collaboration, information sharing, and joint response among stakeholders to prevent, detect, and mitigate cyber threats.
-
B.
cybersecurity agency
A cybersecurity agency is an organization that protects digital systems, networks, and data from cyber threats through monitoring, prevention, incident response, and security consulting.
-
C.
governing body
A governing body is an organized group of individuals with the authority and responsibility to make decisions, set policies, and oversee the direction and management of an institution, community, or state.
-
D.
governance entity
chosen
A governance entity is an individual, group, or organization with the authority and responsibility to establish, oversee, and enforce rules, policies, and decisions within a defined domain.
-
E.
defense acquisition governance body
A defense acquisition governance body is an authoritative organization or board that oversees, directs, and approves major decisions, resources, and policies throughout the defense acquisition lifecycle to ensure alignment with strategic, legal, and budgetary requirements.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34948adfc8190a937f1f622783c0b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:20 a.m.