Triple
T3290764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LEIR |
E69093
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBeamSpecies |
P47768
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pb54+ ions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pb54+ ions | Statement: [LEIR, hasBeamSpecies, Pb54+ ions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBeamSpecies Context triple: [LEIR, hasBeamSpecies, Pb54+ ions]
-
A.
hasTypicalBeam
Indicates that an entity is associated with a characteristic or standard type of beam it commonly uses or possesses.
-
B.
usesPrimaryBeam
Indicates that one entity employs another entity as its main or principal beam in an operation or structure.
-
C.
beamType
Indicates the specific kind or category of beam involved in the relationship or action.
-
D.
hasSpectralChannel
Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a specific spectral channel or band within an electromagnetic spectrum.
-
E.
beamName
Indicates that an entity has or is associated with a specific beam identifier or label.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad859d45748190b0742408c954b39f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb05d0c908190a927d1af78e27de0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada42407dc81909f60d7a14e1b7934 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada526764881908e4bd52938d5374d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:10 p.m.