Triple
T32856034
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Relata II |
E840376
|
entity |
| Predicate | styleOfComposition |
P71622
|
FINISHED |
| Object | integral serialism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: integral serialism | Statement: [Relata II, styleOfComposition, integral serialism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleOfComposition Context triple: [Relata II, styleOfComposition, integral serialism]
-
A.
modeOfComposition
Indicates the method or manner in which something is composed, created, or put together.
-
B.
stylisticElement
Indicates a relationship where one entity functions as a stylistic feature, device, or characteristic that shapes the expressive or aesthetic quality of another entity.
-
C.
featuredComposition
Indicates that one entity is highlighted or prominently presented as a notable composition in relation to another entity (such as a collection, event, or creator).
-
D.
stylisticQuality
Indicates the relationship in which one entity characterizes or evaluates the manner, style, or expressive quality of another entity or work.
-
E.
compositionStyle
chosen
Indicates the characteristic manner or approach in which something is composed, such as its structural, aesthetic, or stylistic conventions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349412c78819084459850e11d29f7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e02ba6b881908dfafc52d3b75f1c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de09c2f481909f8b2545d3208c9f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:17 a.m.