Triple
T3279481
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sydney Central station |
E68837
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTicketingSystem |
P3383
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Opal card |
E98383
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Opal card | Statement: [Sydney Central station, hasTicketingSystem, Opal card]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Opal card Context triple: [Sydney Central station, hasTicketingSystem, Opal card]
-
A.
Opal card
chosen
The Opal card is a reusable, contactless smartcard used to pay for public transport across much of New South Wales, Australia.
-
B.
ORCA card
The ORCA card is a reusable, contactless smart card used to pay fares across multiple public transit systems in the Puget Sound region of Washington State.
-
C.
Myki
Myki is Melbourne’s contactless smartcard public transport ticketing system used across trains, trams, and buses in Victoria, Australia.
-
D.
TAP card
The TAP card is a reusable contactless smart card used to pay fares across public transit systems in the Los Angeles County region.
-
E.
Clipper card
The Clipper card is a reloadable contactless smart card used to pay fares across multiple public transit systems in the San Francisco Bay Area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad859c463481909ca4be267336c290 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb0155430819097c806ee407dc1e4 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b31a6c0aec81908654933a4fa38997 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 7:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:10 p.m.