Triple
T3278712
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grand Treasurer |
E68819
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiresQuality |
P47667
|
FINISHED |
| Object | financial integrity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: financial integrity | Statement: [Grand Treasurer, requiresQuality, financial integrity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresQuality Context triple: [Grand Treasurer, requiresQuality, financial integrity]
-
A.
evaluationRequirement
Indicates that one entity imposes or specifies conditions under which another entity must be assessed, tested, or evaluated.
-
B.
requiresStatus
Indicates that one entity can only proceed, be valid, or be applied if another entity has a specified status or condition.
-
C.
maintenanceRequirement
Indicates that an entity is obligated to perform, schedule, or adhere to specific maintenance activities or conditions for another entity or system.
-
D.
qualityDependsOn
Indicates that the quality or performance of one entity is determined or influenced by the characteristics or state of another entity.
-
E.
requiredBy
Indicates that one entity depends on or cannot function properly without another entity being present, completed, or satisfied.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad859c463481909ca4be267336c290 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb0155430819097c806ee407dc1e4 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada420167c81909b6e2702db296d9e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada526764881908e4bd52938d5374d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:10 p.m.