Triple
T32782009
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joy |
E838379
|
entity |
| Predicate | phoneticLength |
P175513
|
FINISHED |
| Object | one syllable |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one syllable | Statement: [Joy, phoneticLength, one syllable]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: phoneticLength Context triple: [Joy, phoneticLength, one syllable]
-
A.
phoneticValue
Indicates a relationship where a symbol, sign, or written element is associated with the specific sound or sequence of sounds it represents.
-
B.
isPhonetic
Indicates that one entity represents the phonetic (sound-based) form or pronunciation of another entity.
-
C.
degreeOfPhoneticism
Indicates the extent to which a writing system’s symbols correspond directly to the sounds (phonetics) of the spoken language.
-
D.
phoneticComponents
Indicates that one entity serves as a phonetic component or contributes to the pronunciation of another entity.
-
E.
phoneticPattern
Indicates that two or more linguistic elements share a specific arrangement or sequence of sounds according to a defined phonological structure.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493b83f48190be335cd42465cecf |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d210fc80819091ed8961aa2cddfb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe45554819089cbbd538d992132 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6d16b79dc8190ab0d4657f2ef9a5b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:14 a.m.