Triple

T32759463
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject @candiceswanepoel E837714 entity
Predicate hasStories P11859 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [@candiceswanepoel, hasStories, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStories
Context triple: [@candiceswanepoel, hasStories, yes]
  • A. hasBackupStories
    Indicates that an entity maintains additional, alternative stories or narratives that can be used if the primary ones fail or are unavailable.
  • B. hasNarrative chosen
    Indicates that one entity contains, presents, or is associated with a story or narrative about another entity or subject.
  • C. hasVariantStoriesIn
    Indicates that an entity has alternative or differing narrative versions that occur or are found within a specified context or source.
  • D. hasInfluentialStory
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a story that significantly shapes, impacts, or guides the beliefs, actions, or development of another entity.
  • E. hasPrimaryStory
    Indicates that one entity is designated as the main or most important story associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34939857c8190aa9970c51feec1eb completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff246e0d4481908bcec718e1d4025b completed May 9, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff23cb70ac81909b776ace4597ae9c completed May 9, 2026, 12:08 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:13 a.m.