Triple

T326291
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject King of Ireland E6525 entity
Predicate coexistedWith P12845 FINISHED
Object King of England LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: King of England | Statement: [King of Ireland, coexistedWith, King of England]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coexistedWith
Context triple: [King of Ireland, coexistedWith, King of England]
  • A. wasCompanionOf
    Indicates that one entity accompanied or associated closely with another, typically as a partner, ally, or fellow participant over some period of time.
  • B. coordinatedWith
    Indicates that two or more entities have worked together in an organized, cooperative manner toward a shared task, goal, or activity.
  • C. livedDuring
    Indicates that the subject existed or was alive at some point within the time period or lifespan associated with the object.
  • D. historicalContactWith
    Indicates that two entities have interacted or been in communication with each other at some point in the past.
  • E. occurredIn
    Indicates that an event or action took place within a specific location, context, or time frame.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7933d6c8190bb2592ad13286ef2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eb1a37c08190b1380f6bf8513a37 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e949364c8190bc2351f5413f5057 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2eb18bda48190ac3d96a61a6a684d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:18 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.