Triple
T32614616
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hrímþursar |
E833749
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToCosmos |
P59362
|
FINISHED |
| Object | linked to creation of the world through Ymir |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: linked to creation of the world through Ymir | Statement: [Hrímþursar, relationshipToCosmos, linked to creation of the world through Ymir]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToCosmos Context triple: [Hrímþursar, relationshipToCosmos, linked to creation of the world through Ymir]
-
A.
roleInCosmos
chosen
Indicates the function, position, or significance an entity holds within the larger structure or order of the cosmos.
-
B.
positionInCosmos
Indicates the spatial or hierarchical location of an entity within the broader structure of the cosmos or universe.
-
C.
relationshipToCosmoBrown
Indicates the type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Cosmo Brown.
-
D.
viewOnCosmos
Indicates a perspective, opinion, or conceptual stance that something holds regarding the cosmos or the nature of the universe.
-
E.
relationToNeptune
Indicates the specific spatial, orbital, or conceptual relationship that something has with Neptune.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3492bfa648190b6ae472074634e29 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037cad051c8190b28b354b89208574 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f0cbe481909b4b8fc6cbe297f0 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:06 a.m.