Triple

T32603741
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Naor–Reingold pseudorandom function E833448 entity
Predicate provenUnder P18400 FINISHED
Object Decisional Diffie–Hellman assumption NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Decisional Diffie–Hellman assumption | Statement: [Naor–Reingold pseudorandom function, provenUnder, Decisional Diffie–Hellman assumption]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: provenUnder
Context triple: [Naor–Reingold pseudorandom function, provenUnder, Decisional Diffie–Hellman assumption]
  • A. provesTo
    Indicates that one entity demonstrates or establishes the truth or validity of something to another entity.
  • B. proved
    Indicates that one entity has demonstrated the truth or validity of another entity (such as a statement, theorem, or claim) through logical or evidential means.
  • C. partiallyProvenFor
    Indicates that something has been shown to hold or be true for part of a domain or set of cases, but not yet for all cases.
  • D. provedInFullBy
    Indicates that something (such as a claim, theorem, or statement) has been completely and rigorously demonstrated or established by a particular agent or source.
  • E. attestedBy chosen
    Indicates that the existence, occurrence, or validity of something is supported, confirmed, or documented by a specified source or authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3492ab63c8190aec24d5003b47c29 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6c8159edc8190b1c87015e0c820e8 completed May 3, 2026, 3:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6c3f42fbc8190a06eb1044c9e6094 completed May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:05 a.m.