Triple
T32542444
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fiat–Shamir heuristic |
E831747
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | non-interactive proof transformation technique |
C28854
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: non-interactive proof transformation technique Context triple: [Fiat–Shamir heuristic, instanceOf, non-interactive proof transformation technique]
-
A.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
B.
interactive theorem prover
An interactive theorem prover is a software system that assists users in the formalization and step-by-step verification of mathematical proofs or program properties through human-guided logical reasoning.
-
C.
cryptographic protocol component
A cryptographic protocol component is a modular element—such as a key exchange, authentication step, or encryption mechanism—that participates in a larger protocol to provide specific security properties like confidentiality, integrity, or authenticity.
-
D.
end-to-end auditable voting scheme
An end-to-end auditable voting scheme is a voting system that allows each voter and independent observers to verify, from ballot casting through tallying, that all recorded votes are correctly included in the final result without revealing how any individual voted.
-
E.
construction in proof theory
chosen
A construction in proof theory is a systematically defined method or procedure used within formal proofs to build objects, derive new statements, or transform existing proofs while preserving logical validity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34925fd08819084cfe4ec566cb704 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:02 a.m.