Triple

T32498312
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Message-Digest Algorithm 5 E830584 entity
Predicate outputEncodingCommonlyUsed P33682 FINISHED
Object hexadecimal LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hexadecimal | Statement: [Message-Digest Algorithm 5, outputEncodingCommonlyUsed, hexadecimal]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: outputEncodingCommonlyUsed
Context triple: [Message-Digest Algorithm 5, outputEncodingCommonlyUsed, hexadecimal]
  • A. localEncoding
    Indicates that an entity is represented or stored using a specific encoding scheme that is defined or applied locally within a particular context or system.
  • B. encodingAbstraction
    Indicates an abstraction relationship where one representation or model encodes, summarizes, or symbolically captures the structure or information content of another.
  • C. dataEncodingMethod chosen
    Indicates the specific technique or format used to encode data for storage, transmission, or processing.
  • D. colorEncoding
    Indicates how the color information of an entity is represented, formatted, or encoded.
  • E. requestEncoding
    Indicates that one entity asks another to use or provide a specific encoding format for data or communication.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349219cb8819087e120f509629c1b completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6c4409dc48190a9eac031b88571a1 completed May 3, 2026, 3:42 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6bd2a14b081908162923dfbf0a6f4 completed May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:59 a.m.