Triple
T32498295
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Message-Digest Algorithm 5 |
E830584
|
entity |
| Predicate | cryptographicSecurityStatus |
P11824
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not recommended |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not recommended | Statement: [Message-Digest Algorithm 5, cryptographicSecurityStatus, not recommended]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cryptographicSecurityStatus Context triple: [Message-Digest Algorithm 5, cryptographicSecurityStatus, not recommended]
-
A.
securityStatus
chosen
Indicates the current level or condition of protection, risk, or vulnerability associated with an entity or system.
-
B.
cryptanalysisStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of efforts to analyze or break a cryptographic system or cipher.
-
C.
cryptographicRelevance
Indicates that something has significance, impact, or utility within a cryptographic context, such as for security, encryption, or cryptographic analysis.
-
D.
cryptographicType
Indicates the specific kind or category of cryptographic method, algorithm, or primitive associated with an entity or operation.
-
E.
cryptographicModel
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as, or is based on, a particular cryptographic scheme, framework, or formal model.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349219cb8819087e120f509629c1b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c8159edc8190b1c87015e0c820e8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f42fbc8190a06eb1044c9e6094 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:59 a.m.