Triple
T32498253
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | MD4 |
E830583
|
entity |
| Predicate | suitableForGeneralSecurityUse |
P174515
|
FINISHED |
| Object | false |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: false | Statement: [MD4, suitableForGeneralSecurityUse, false]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: suitableForGeneralSecurityUse Context triple: [MD4, suitableForGeneralSecurityUse, false]
-
A.
isSecureFor
Indicates that one entity provides a level of protection or safety that makes it appropriate or safe for use, access, or interaction by another entity.
-
B.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
-
C.
isGeneralPurposeIn
Indicates that something serves a broad, non-specialized function or use within a specified context, domain, or environment.
-
D.
hasSecurityStandard
Indicates that an entity complies with, follows, or is governed by a specified security standard or framework.
-
E.
consideredSecure
Indicates that something is regarded as safe from harm, risk, or unauthorized access according to given criteria or standards.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349219cb8819087e120f509629c1b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c4409dc48190a9eac031b88571a1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6bd2a14b081908162923dfbf0a6f4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6c1b666188190ac43c3011a7df048 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:59 a.m.