Triple
T32487721
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NameNode |
E830287
|
entity |
| Predicate | canStoreMetadataOn |
P61555
|
FINISHED |
| Object | local filesystem |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local filesystem | Statement: [NameNode, canStoreMetadataOn, local filesystem]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canStoreMetadataOn Context triple: [NameNode, canStoreMetadataOn, local filesystem]
-
A.
canBeStoredOn
Indicates that one entity is capable of being placed, kept, or maintained on another entity as a storage location.
-
B.
canBeStoredFor
Indicates that something is suitable or allowed to be kept in storage for a certain duration or under certain conditions.
-
C.
storesMetadataIn
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds or maintains descriptive or configuration metadata about another entity within a specified storage location or system.
-
D.
dynamicMetadataSupport
Indicates that the subject system or component is capable of handling metadata that can change or be updated at runtime rather than being fixed or static.
-
E.
mayUseStorageType
Indicates that an entity is permitted to use or access a particular type of storage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34920aa4081908d8fb0277414b911 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c3f9e5448190b47486b32738e7b0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6bd25bed08190befcabd3a41ffadf |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:58 a.m.