Triple
T32467553
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | State Historic Park Preserve |
E829751
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConservationLevel |
P206285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | state |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state | Statement: [State Historic Park Preserve, hasConservationLevel, state]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConservationLevel Context triple: [State Historic Park Preserve, hasConservationLevel, state]
-
A.
hasConservationCategory
Indicates the conservation or protection status category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting its level of environmental or heritage significance or vulnerability.
-
B.
hasConservationPriority
Indicates that an entity is assigned a particular level or status of importance for conservation or protection efforts.
-
C.
hasConservationConcernIn
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified conservation concern status within a particular geographic area or jurisdiction.
-
D.
typeOfConservation
Indicates the specific kind or category of conservation practice, method, or approach that applies to an entity or situation.
-
E.
hasConservationAspect
Indicates that something is associated with, involves, or possesses a particular conservation-related aspect or consideration.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3491ee87c81908cbf5890079c2af6 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379edf2d88190b492fca86ed23cac |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c7fb9f88190b384b1b68200aef0 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:57 a.m.