Triple
T3245464
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DTrace |
E68056
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsUserDefinedProbes |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [DTrace, supportsUserDefinedProbes, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsUserDefinedProbes Context triple: [DTrace, supportsUserDefinedProbes, true]
-
A.
supportsExperiment
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary resources, conditions, or assistance for an experiment to be conducted or to function as intended.
-
B.
supportsObservationModes
Indicates that one entity provides or is compatible with specific modes or methods of observation used by another entity.
-
C.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
-
D.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
E.
hasProvisionOn
Indicates that one entity contains, specifies, or includes a particular provision, clause, or stipulation concerning another entity or subject.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad858e4c708190aa31d486cfee8a6a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adaf1a96148190b63bf46209712707 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada41837e48190933572165be0ca38 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:09 p.m.