Triple
T32414545
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Azure Functions Core Tools |
E828304
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsBindingType |
P206268
|
FINISHED |
| Object | input bindings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: input bindings | Statement: [Azure Functions Core Tools, supportsBindingType, input bindings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsBindingType Context triple: [Azure Functions Core Tools, supportsBindingType, input bindings]
-
A.
supportsType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accepting, or being compatible with a specified type.
-
B.
supportsTargetType
Indicates that one entity is capable of operating with, handling, or being compatible with a specified target type.
-
C.
supportsModelType
Indicates that an entity is compatible with, or can operate using, a specified model type.
-
D.
supportsRuleType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, applying, or being compatible with a specified type of rule.
-
E.
supportsPluginType
Indicates that one entity is capable of working with, handling, or being compatible with a specified type of plugin.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34919f300819092b541c6277cd68a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379edf2d88190b492fca86ed23cac |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c7fb9f88190b384b1b68200aef0 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:53 a.m.