Triple
T3239340
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | I Spy (1965 TV series) |
E67929
|
entity |
| Predicate | mixesElementsOf |
P47548
|
FINISHED |
| Object | espionage |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: espionage | Statement: [I Spy (1965 TV series), mixesElementsOf, espionage]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mixesElementsOf Context triple: [I Spy (1965 TV series), mixesElementsOf, espionage]
-
A.
mixesWith
Indicates that one entity is combined or blended together with another entity to form a mixture.
-
B.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
C.
mixtape
Indicates that one entity has created or compiled a curated collection of audio tracks, typically recorded or assembled together as a single compilation.
-
D.
musicFusionOf
Indicates a relationship where one musical work, style, or element is created by combining or blending two or more distinct musical sources or genres.
-
E.
mergedBy
Indicates that one entity is combined or integrated into another entity through the action or decision of a specific agent.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad858d27348190abb61c280b4c86a9 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adaef4c0bc819095e4f84296fe7cb6 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada4159e0481908cbbdd750f5e08c7 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada698eeb48190a1f5762fdd3b7b63 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:40 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:08 p.m.