Triple

T3233283
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Heinrich Bullinger E67791 entity
Predicate doctrineDeveloped P27707 FINISHED
Object covenant theology LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: covenant theology | Statement: [Heinrich Bullinger, doctrineDeveloped, covenant theology]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrineDeveloped
Context triple: [Heinrich Bullinger, doctrineDeveloped, covenant theology]
  • A. developedDoctrine chosen
    Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
  • B. doctrineExplainedBy
    Indicates that an explanation or interpretation is provided for a particular doctrine by a specified source or agent.
  • C. doctrineFocus
    Indicates that a doctrine, teaching, or belief is primarily concerned with, centered on, or directed toward a particular subject or theme.
  • D. appliedDoctrine
    Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
  • E. developmentMethod
    Indicates the process, technique, or approach used to create, build, or evolve something.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad858d27348190abb61c280b4c86a9 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adaedb718c8190aae12f763033713a completed March 8, 2026, 5:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada4159e0481908cbbdd750f5e08c7 completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:08 p.m.