Triple
T32323213
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cities in Flight |
E825831
|
entity |
| Predicate | fictionalTechnologyInventor |
P632
|
FINISHED |
| Object | spindizzy |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: spindizzy | Statement: [Cities in Flight, fictionalTechnologyInventor, spindizzy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fictionalTechnologyInventor Context triple: [Cities in Flight, fictionalTechnologyInventor, spindizzy]
-
A.
fictionalInvention
Indicates that one entity is an invention or creation that exists only within the fictional context of another entity (such as a story, universe, or work).
-
B.
hasInventorRoleOf
Indicates that an entity holds or fulfills the role of inventor with respect to another entity (such as an invention, patent, or creative work).
-
C.
featuresFictionalTechnology
Indicates that an entity includes, depicts, or makes use of imagined or speculative technology that does not exist in reality.
-
D.
wasInventedBy
chosen
Indicates that something (typically an object, concept, or process) was created or brought into existence by a particular inventor or originator.
-
E.
notableInventor
Indicates that the subject is a well-known or historically significant inventor of the object.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34912d0c48190bba75770660320e9 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fdb45537288190b6791078d4a6899f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdb39ad96481908376d7def9fafc13 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:57 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:47 a.m.