Triple
T32310550
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Justice M. C. Chagla Commission |
E825486
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial inquiry commission |
C45326
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: judicial inquiry commission Context triple: [Justice M. C. Chagla Commission, instanceOf, judicial inquiry commission]
-
A.
judicial commission
chosen
A judicial commission is an official body, often temporary and independent, established to investigate, review, or make recommendations on specific legal or public-interest matters.
-
B.
judicial investigation
A judicial investigation is a formal, legally authorized inquiry conducted by judicial authorities to gather, examine, and evaluate evidence in order to determine whether laws have been violated and if legal proceedings should follow.
-
C.
judicial advisory committee
A judicial advisory committee is a group of appointed experts and stakeholders that provides recommendations and guidance to the judiciary on matters such as court administration, procedural rules, and judicial policy.
-
D.
military inquiry board
A military inquiry board is a formal panel of military officers convened to investigate specific incidents, actions, or conduct within the armed forces and to determine facts, responsibility, and potential recommendations.
-
E.
Judicial conference committee
A judicial conference committee is a group of judges and related officials convened to study, discuss, and recommend policies or rules to improve the administration and operation of the court system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3491213b88190a57094d8697a7455 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:46 a.m.