Triple
T322110
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Verizon |
E6433
|
entity |
| Predicate | networkTechnology |
P3937
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 4G LTE |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4G LTE | Statement: [Verizon, networkTechnology, 4G LTE]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: networkTechnology Context triple: [Verizon, networkTechnology, 4G LTE]
-
A.
networkType
chosen
Indicates the category or kind of network associated with or used by an entity (e.g., wired, wireless, virtual, or specific protocol-based networks).
-
B.
network
Indicates that one entity is connected to or interacts with another through a system of relationships, communication, or information exchange.
-
C.
technologyType
Indicates the specific kind or category of technology associated with an entity or relationship.
-
D.
technologyLevel
Indicates the degree of technological advancement or sophistication associated with an entity relative to others or to a defined scale.
-
E.
technologicalFeature
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7933d6c8190bb2592ad13286ef2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea81a1e88190b3496070eb3d85f5 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e948048c819098ba4de9261ef2ef |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.