Triple
T32190271
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lieutenant Ilia |
E822218
|
entity |
| Predicate | takesOathFor |
P101277
|
FINISHED |
| Object | service in Starfleet |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: service in Starfleet | Statement: [Lieutenant Ilia, takesOathFor, service in Starfleet]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: takesOathFor Context triple: [Lieutenant Ilia, takesOathFor, service in Starfleet]
-
A.
oathTakenBy
Indicates that an oath or formal promise has been made by a specific entity.
-
B.
hasOathTo
Indicates a relationship in which one entity is bound by an oath or sworn commitment to another entity.
-
C.
administersOathTo
Indicates that one entity formally gives or conducts an oath that another entity takes.
-
D.
takesVowsOf
chosen
Indicates that an entity formally commits to specific vows, promises, or oaths, typically within a religious, ceremonial, or institutional context.
-
E.
oath
Indicates a formal, binding promise or pledge made by one party to uphold certain duties, truths, or obligations, often under conditions of solemnity or authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490819cc81909bae1f8ce99423c5 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6bbbef7a88190b0affdec1d41c1e0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6ba6cef208190bc5cd43d96127004 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:01 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:35 a.m.