Triple
T32152203
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Leroy Washington |
E821188
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDoctrineEstablishedInCase |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel | Statement: [David Leroy Washington, legalDoctrineEstablishedInCase, two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalDoctrineEstablishedInCase Context triple: [David Leroy Washington, legalDoctrineEstablishedInCase, two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel]
-
A.
lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtHolding
Indicates that the lawsuit is connected to, influenced by, or governed by a specific holding or decision of the Supreme Court.
-
B.
legalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
C.
legalPrecedentFrom
Indicates that a legal decision, ruling, or principle is derived from, based on, or justified by an earlier legal case or authority.
-
D.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
E.
legalCitation
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490520d081909b2f1271dab75faa |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fec8aef1d8819094c7fd7074038e6b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fec639876481908efd84a3631a4271 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:31 a.m.