Triple
T32152202
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Leroy Washington |
E821188
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseOutcomeForDefendant |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ineffective assistance claim rejected by Supreme Court |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ineffective assistance claim rejected by Supreme Court | Statement: [David Leroy Washington, caseOutcomeForDefendant, ineffective assistance claim rejected by Supreme Court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: caseOutcomeForDefendant Context triple: [David Leroy Washington, caseOutcomeForDefendant, ineffective assistance claim rejected by Supreme Court]
-
A.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
defendantStatus
Indicates the legal condition or standing of a defendant within a judicial or law-enforcement process.
-
C.
defendant
Indicates that an entity is the party accused or sued in a legal action or proceeding.
-
D.
outcomeOf
Indicates that one entity is the result, consequence, or product that arises from another entity, event, or process.
-
E.
coDefendant
Indicates that two or more parties are jointly named and involved as defendants in the same legal case or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490520d081909b2f1271dab75faa |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b9eccab88190a2895cbb0332c5a7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b3a970b0819090c6473844ffa8e3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:31 a.m.