Triple
T32152
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Theory of Island Biogeography |
E641
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliedTo |
P1129
|
FINISHED |
| Object | oceanic islands |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oceanic islands | Statement: [The Theory of Island Biogeography, appliedTo, oceanic islands]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliedTo Context triple: [The Theory of Island Biogeography, appliedTo, oceanic islands]
-
A.
appliesTo
chosen
Indicates that something is relevant, valid, or has effect in relation to a particular entity, case, or context.
-
B.
grantedTo
Indicates that a right, permission, or resource has been formally given or assigned by one party to another.
-
C.
providedFor
Indicates that one entity supplies, furnishes, or makes something available to or on behalf of another entity for its use or benefit.
-
D.
usedAt
Indicates that something is employed, applied, or utilized at a particular place, time, or context.
-
E.
adoptedBy
Indicates that an entity has been taken in and legally or formally accepted as a child, member, or responsibility by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2479dec388190967ba648663442c9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a249ec0d288190ac3a0939db61813b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24870417081909c7c01e400c94716 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.