Triple
T32099337
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Atramhasis |
E819799
|
entity |
| Predicate | occupationInMyth |
P9987
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sage |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sage | Statement: [Atramhasis, occupationInMyth, sage]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: occupationInMyth Context triple: [Atramhasis, occupationInMyth, sage]
-
A.
mythologicalRole
chosen
Indicates the specific function, duty, or status an entity holds within a mythological or legendary context.
-
B.
mythologicalCategory
Indicates that one entity is classified as belonging to the mythological type, group, or category represented by the other entity.
-
C.
mythologicalContent
Indicates that the subject contains, references, or is associated with myths, mythological narratives, or myth-based elements.
-
D.
roleInTheology
Indicates the specific function, position, or significance an entity holds within a theological system, doctrine, or belief framework.
-
E.
nationalityInMyth
Indicates that a mythological figure, character, or entity is associated with a particular nationality or cultural tradition within mythology.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34901106881908ea893ad504a08be |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c8159edc8190b1c87015e0c820e8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f42fbc8190a06eb1044c9e6094 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:26 a.m.